• Nov 11

    I’d like to follow-up on my post entitled Your Personal Health Care Reform.  I said it then and I’ll say it again…We need to now more than ever start looking towards prevention to save our lives.  I know, I know, we can’t run around like Negative Nancys, worrying constantly about random calamities.  Those we can never prevent.  What we can prevent is serious life threatening conditions like cancer, heart disease, and type 2 diabetes.

    In an article recently posted on the New York Times website, the writer  recommends acupuncture as a resource for your personal health care reform.  As a licensed acupuncturist I can agree that this popular form of Alternative medicine plays an active and successful roll in the art of prevention, but it doesn’t start there, and it does not need to be that costly.  Prevention starts with each individual.  It’s the choice between a burger or a salad, between a walk around the corner or an hour on the couch in front of the tube.  Did you know that 1 extra serving of fruits or vegetables each day (that’s 1/2 a cup!) can prevent your chances of heart disease by 4%?!  Think of the possibilities you have to save your life: that’s 1 apple, 10 baby carrots, 6 strawberries, half a sweet potato, 3 celery sticks, 1 banana…the list goes on and on and on.

    Prevention is a commitment, it’s true, but not to your job or to your teacher or your government.  It’s a commitment to yourself and to those that love you, that you will try to make your life as healthy and happy as you can.  No more easier said than done people.  I will not admit that it is more convenient to clog your arteries than to snack on a carrot.  Or that being a couch potato will bring you more joy than a bike ride with your child.  Those statements are simply erronious.  I will admit that change can be a challenge and I invite you to accept the challenge.  You don’t have to run a marathon (unless you want to), and you don’t have to cut out every guilty pleasure that passes your lips (although the more, the better.)  It starts with a little each day.  You know what you have to do!

    For those of you who are on the path, 2 kudos to you.  Now spread the word and share with others your success.  Help bail your brothers and sisters out of their personal health crisis through education and compassion.  We can beat the terror of heart disease and cancer, but it starts at home, and it doesn’t have to cost billions of dollars.   In fact, it can cost less than a value meal.

    Read The NY Times article: An Economy in Need of Holistic Medicine…

    Who will Bail out your At-Risk Heart?
  • Oct 19

    Today’s Los Angeles Times online Health section posted an article by Elena Conis entitled Poring over facts about milk: cow’s, goat’s, soy, almond, rice and hemp.  In this article Conis took the time to examine the seven types of milk common to today’s market.  Read the whole story…

    What she found is there are pros and cons to each product.  Have a look at the chart below to see if you can decipher why one might be better than another.

    milk comparison

    What Colis found is that not every milk is good for every person.  Cow and goat’s milk are high in fat and cholesterol, and contain lactose, a common food allergen, but are also high in important nutrients such as protein and calcium.  Soy milk is a good source of protein but there is an ever growing concern over the estrogen-like compounds it contains.  Rice milk is another alternative, but is often filled with sweetener and lacks protein.

    It seems that the best way to decide which to pour over your cereal is to understand your body’s individual needs.  Have your cholesterol levels checked, find out how many calories you need per day to maintain a healthy weight, be aware of your food sensitivities, and make sure you are getting your daily dose of recommended nutrients, whether they be from food or a supplemental source.


    Milk…Does it do Every Body Good?
  • Oct 16

    The battle against breast cancer continues.  Each year nearly 200,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer and more than 40,000 lose their battle.  It is the number one cancer occurring in women in the U.S. and it occurs in men as well.  While there is still no cure, education and early detection can help against the fight.  To find out the facts about breast cancer, early detection and how you can help, as well as support for those with the disease, please visit the National Breast Cancer Foundation’s website.

    breast cancer page

    October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month
  • Oct 12

    The following article was posted on today’s LA Time’s website.   It reminds me of the important point that eating right and exercising are not always about being thin.  It’s about feeling good and being healthy.   

    Do extra pounds always equal extra risk?

     By Marnell Jameson

    Though many people connect poor health with excess weight, the two don’t always go together. Even as most health experts say that fat fuels the onset of diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, some cancers and arthritis — and with the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention linking obesity to 9% of health care costs — folks behind the Health at Every Size program say that such statistics don’t actually take healthy fat people into account.

    One of the largest studies to support their claim that weight doesn’t determine health is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, published in August 2008 in the Archives of Internal Medicine. The NHANES study looked at 5,440 adults, assessing weight and metabolic health indicators such as blood pressure, cholesterol, blood lipids, blood glucose, insulin resistance and other diabetic markers. Although those in the normal weight group were healthiest, metabolically speaking (76.5%), nearly one out of four fell into the abnormal range. In the overweight group, more than half (51.3%) were metabolically healthy; as were nearly a third (31.7%) of the obese group.

    The researchers’ conclusion: Although fat people are more apt to be metabolically unhealthy, plenty of fat people are healthy, and plenty of thin people are unhealthy.

    “You can’t know just based on a person’s size whether that person has good or poor health habits,” says Linda Bacon, a professor of nutrition at City College of San Francisco and author of “Health at Every Size: The Surprising Truth About Your Weight” (Ben- Bella 2008). “Some people are heavy and unhealthy, and some are heavy and health- y.”

    So instead, folks behind the Health at Every Size program, which Bacon and many others are researching and promoting, advocate intuitive eating — that is, teaching people to tune in to their hunger signals

    By doing so, they say, people are more likely to eat when they’re hungry, not because it’s lunch time, and to stop when they’re satisfied not stuffed. These advocates also encourage people of every size to embrace physical activities that feel good and that they enjoy. “The advice applies whether you’re 100 pounds or 500 pounds,” Bacon says.

    Bacon and her colleagues tested the Every Size theories with funding from the National Institutes of Health, and published their findings in the Journal of the American Dietetic Assn. in 2005.

    The study tracked 78 obese women between the ages of 30 and 45. Half the group participated in the Every Size program, and half participated in a traditional weight-centered diet. Two years later, researchers found that both groups weighed the same as when they started. (Although the diet group’s members had lost weight at the six-month checkpoint, they’d gained it back by the two-year mark.)

    However, unlike the diet group, the Every Size group lowered its blood cholesterol and blood pressure and maintained those reductions for the entire course of the study. The dieters did not lower their cholesterol at any point, and did not maintain the lowered blood pressures they achieved in the first six months.

    Similarly, levels of depression improved and self-esteem increased for both groups at first. However, only the Every Size group sustained the positive mood and self-esteem scores two years later. The dieters’ depression levels fell back to near original levels, and self-esteem scores were worse at follow up.

    “Increasing evidence supports the belief that diseases associated with obesity can be reversed or minimized through lifestyle changes, even without weight loss, and people can improve their health while remaining obese,” says Bacon, who — incidentally — at 5 feet tall and 105 pounds has a low BMI of 20.5. For heavy people who have tried unsuccessfully to lose weight, a health-centered rather than a weight-centered approach may help them get healthy if not thin.

    Not all health experts are so quick to give heavy people a hall pass.

    “It’s dangerous to go down the path that says it’s OK to be obese,” says Janet Pregler, director of the Iris Cantor UCLA Women’s Health Center and a professor of clinical medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. “We know that obesity is a detriment to health.”

    But even Pregler acknowledges that obesity is very difficult to treat and may never be fully resolved. “Weight-loss interventions are so ineffective,” she says. “So I agree that if you’re obese and doing what you can to reduce or manage other risk factors, that’s an important goal.”

    Do I have to Lose Weight??
  • Oct 6

    The CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) has declared this week, October 5 – 11, 2009, Get Smart about Antibiotics Week.  Their efforts originate from the need to educate the population about antibiotic resistance and the importance of appropriate antibiotic use.

    Antibiotics have been around since even before the hailed Penicillin was discovered.  Ancient Chinese, Egyptians, Greek and medi-evil Arabs all used plants and molds with antibiotic-like properties to fight infection.  Today no one has to go out to the field in search of plants, or set aside an slice of bread and wait for mold to grow in order to obtain these powerful antimicrobial compounds.  Antibiotics are as easy as a trip to your family doctor and their effectiveness is just as simple.  Well, almost…

    While antibiotics are fabulous against bacterial infection, they do not fight infections caused by viruses, which, I hate to tell ya, is the category common colds and flu fall into.  Doctors everyday see children and adults for sore throats, ear infections, upper respiratory infections, sinus infections, all of which could be a bacterial infection, but more often than not are viral.  By prescribing an antibiotic to these patients before finding out the cause, they are doing more harm than good, both to the patient and the population.

    When antibiotics are used too often for things they can’t treat, they can stop working effectively against bacteria.  Antibiotic resistance has been a concern for years and is considered one of the world’s most pressing public health problems.  Widespread overuse of antibiotics is fueling an increase in antibiotic-resistant bacteria. So the next time you or your child really needs an antibiotic for a bacterial infection, it may not work. ¹

    Watch this short video put out by National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) to help parents and kids learn more about improper antibiotic prescription:

    Also read NY Times columnist ANAHAD O’CONNOR’s Really? The Claim: Antibiotics Will Beat a Sinus Infection for facts about antibiotics and sinus infections.

    References
    ¹ Get Smart: Know When Antibiotics Work

    Get Smart about Antibiotics
  • Oct 1

    Article published September 22, 2008 on NY Times Well Blog by Tara Parker-Pope

    back pain relieved by needles

    An acupuncturist inserts needles into a patient. (M. Spencer Green/AP)

    Treatments for breast cancer can lead to unpleasant side effects for most women, including hot flashes, sweating and lack of energy. Now, new research suggests relief can come from an unconventional therapy — acupuncture.

    Research from the Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, presented this week at the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology’s annual meeting in Boston, studied acupuncture use among 47 women who were receiving anti-estrogen treatments, including tamoxifen or anastrozole (Arimidex). The drugs are known to lower the risk of breast cancer recurrence, but they can trigger menopause-like symptoms, including hot flashes and night sweats. Half the women were given the antidepressant Effexor, which has been shown to reduce hot flashes in breast cancer patients. The other half received acupuncture therapy once or twice a week during the 12-week study.

    The acupuncture worked just as well as the antidepressant Effexor to curb hot flashes. Women who received acupuncture also reported fewer side effects and more energy, and some reported an increased sex drive, compared to women who used Effexor, the study showed.

    Dr. Eleanor M. Walker, director of breast radiation oncology at the Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, said that while she expected to see some benefits from acupuncture, the results were surprising.

    “I was surprised by the duration of the effect,” Dr. Walker said in an interview. “I didn’t realize it would last so long or result in an increase in sex drive and energy. That was a surprise.”

    Last year, a report in The Journal of Clinical Oncology suggested a benefit of acupuncture compared to a “sham” acupuncture treatment, but the results didn’t reach statistical significance.

    Because the most recent study lasted only three months, it’s not clear how long the benefit of acupuncture lasts. The study authors said that more research is needed to find out if regular “booster” sessions after the initial treatment period will continue to relieve a woman’s symptoms.

    Acupuncture Offers Relief for Breast Cancer Patients
  • Sep 18

    The New England Journal of Medicine published a health policy report yesterday, discussing the benefits of higher taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages.  soda coolerThe authors of this proposal, all respected doctors and PhD’s, suggest that because “the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages has been linked to risks for obesity, diabetes, and heart disease…a compelling case can be made for the need for reduced consumption of these beverages.”

    They believe that, not only will a new tax reduce the consumption thereby positively effecting the health of our county, but it will also generate a revenue that can then be used to support health-related programs, an estimated $14.9 billion if a tax of a penny an ounce is applied.   This tax would be for soft drinks, energy drinks, sports beverages and many juices and iced teas,  excluding sugar-free diet drinks.

    According to an article in The New York Times, this proposal is getting some attention in Washington. President Obama has said it is worth considering.    Read the full article….

    What do you think?

    Should sugary-beverages be taxed?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    A New Tax on Sugary Beverages?
  • Sep 10

    I’ve been thinking about writing a piece on this topic for some time. CNN beat me to it, but they hit the nail right on the head!

    Eat the Rainbow
  • Sep 10
    Article by RONI CARYN RABIN
    Published: July 21, 2009 in THE NEW YORK TIMES 

    Many studies have suggested that a diet rich in fish is good for the heart. Now there is new evidence that such a diet may ward off dementia as well. One of the largest efforts to document a connection — and the first such study undertaken in the developing world — has found that older adults in Asia and Latin America were less likely to develop dementia if they regularly consumed fish.

    And the more fish they ate, the lower their risk, the report found. The findings appear in the August issue of The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

    The study, which included 15,000 people 65 and older in China, India, Cuba, Venezuela, Mexico, Peru and the Dominican Republic, found that those who ate fish nearly every day were almost 20 percent less likely to develop dementia than those who ate fish just a few days a week. Adults who ate fish a few days a week were almost 20 percent less likely to develop dementia than those who ate no fish at all.

    “There is a gradient effect, so the more fish you eat, the less likely you are to get dementia,” said Dr. Emiliano Albanese, a clinical epidemiologist at King’s College London and the senior author of the study. “Exactly the opposite is true for meat,” he added. “The more meat you eat, the more likely you are to have dementia.” Other studies have shown that red meat in particular may be bad for the brain.

    Observational studies in the West also have indicated fish may reduce dementia risk, but there is little evidence as yet from randomized, controlled clinical trials.

    Read the Study

    Aging: Eating Fish May Ward Off Dementia
Welcome to Cultivate Your Wellness! Follow me as I share with you easy tips for healthy living in an everyday lifestyle.

What I’m Reading